| |
Over the
last several years, CCS has been studying the specific
ecology of salt marsh chemistry and plant species
distribution on Cape Cod with help from The Boston
Foundation, New England Natural Areas Wildlife Grants
Program, and Sweet Water Trust. This support has led to
a great deal of valuable data and the development of a
directed research and monitoring program designed to
work with state agencies and land management groups to
improve coastal wetland restoration. The project
hypotheses, goals, and preliminary findings are detailed
below:
|

Beach grass (Ammophila
breviligulata) fringing the edge of a
native salt marsh community dominated by
cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora)
|
The
Center for Coastal Studies has recently completed the
first year of a three-year comprehensive ecological
assessment of a series of tidally restricted salt
marshes within Cape Cod. The study is designed to
examine the significance of marsh age, soil texture and
soil biogeochemistry between native (cord grass [Spartina])
and invasive (reed grass [Phragmites]) plant communities
occurring within Cape Cod’s salt marsh habitat. These
data will be considered as they relate to conservation,
restoration and management of these valuable ecosystems.
Specifically, the data gathered will aid in the
development of site-specific restoration strategies
designed to promote native plant species and discourage
invasive plant communities that detract from wetland
functions and values and associated wildlife habitat.
This project is based upon CCS’s on-going ecological
assessment salt marsh restoration and ecology within the
Cape Cod Bay and our Coastal Solutions initiative to
link rigorous scientific study with existing land
management and policy towards improving coastal wetland
restoration.
To
insure the applicability of this study to timely
restoration issues in the state of Massachusetts, CCS
focused upon salt marshes cited in the Atlas of Tidally
Restricted Salt Marshes of Cape Cod, produced by the
Cape Cod Commission in conjunction with the
Massachusetts Wetland Restoration Program. The rationale
is simple – to provide a scientific basis to support and
improve coastal wetland restoration success. CCS
scientists plan to continue to record plant community
structure, pore water chemistry, and soil
characteristics using standard, reproducible methods
within these Cape Cod salt marsh ecosystems towards the
improvement of restoration planning and implementation.
This continuing project seeks to achieve this through
two components: 1) an on-going ecological monitoring
component, including measurement of several biological
and biogeochemical parameters, designed to classify
general coastal marsh types; and 2) a modeling component
to apply results towards the development of more
effective site-specific management decisions within
presently identified systems suggested for future
restoration.
Based upon data collection from the 2003 growing season,
CCS has compiled a preliminary profile of a selection of
Cape Cod salt marshes, highlighting the relationships
between soil types, interstitial biogeochemistry, and
the dominant plant community. In short, the data
demonstrate potentially significant differences between
the soil and chemistry between restricted and natural
marshes that may be exploited to promote effective plant
community restoration. Through continued monitoring, the
data can direct the pre-restoration planning process by
providing a site-specific understanding of existing
conditions, and aid in the prediction of desired
outcomes. Meanwhile, these data can contribute to a Cape
wide data base valuable to scientists and land managers.
Presently CCS is in the process of creating a web-based
system of reporting these data, so that they will be
immediately available to the public.
Given the great expense of wetlands restoration and the
large number of potential projects, it is essential to
establish rational, scientifically-proven methods to
measure results and determine the success of such
ventures. CCS believes this continued project will help
both managers and funders in setting their own
priorities for selecting restoration projects in the
future. Through the implementation of our ongoing study,
CCS has developed stronger working relationships and
pending collaborations with local and state agencies,
actively working towards improving wetlands management
and restoration as well as data exchange within and
between interest groups.
While preliminary at this stage, the data reflect the
well-documented trend where tidally restricted salt
marsh sites maintain significantly lower salinity than
natural, unrestricted sites within the same system. With
reduced tidal exchange comes a decreases in oxygen-rich
water flushing the systems, thus, tidally restricted
sites tend to be more anaerobic (lacking oxygen). Again,
overall, the sites sampled reflected this predicted
pattern (Table 1). Despite this trend, when restricted
and unrestricted portions of salt marsh systems were
compared at individual sites, CCS data suggests that the
strength of this prediction breaks down. At many sites,
significant difference did not exist, questioning the
potential effectiveness of tidal restoration strategies
for these systems. In fact, highlighting site-specific
differences is one of the goals this study attempts to
demonstrate, as shown in Table 2. At these sites, novel,
site-specific management strategies may be required to
achieve restoration goals.
|
Parameter (units) |
n |
Restricted |
Natural |
|
Salinity (ppt) |
74 |
15.1 (1.1) a |
21.5 (1.0) b |
|
pH |
68 |
7.4 (0.8) a |
6.1 (0.8) a |
|
Redox (mV) |
74 |
-265 (11) a |
-233 (10) b |
|
Sulfide (uM) |
61 |
0.4 (0.1) a |
0.3 (0.1) a |
|
Nitrate (mM) |
61 |
0.3 (0.1) |
0.1 (0.1) b |
Table 1: Mean values for selected pore water
biogeochemical parameters between tidally restricted and
unrestricted salt marshes within Cape Cod Bay. Standard
deviation is shown in parentheses. Significant
differences are denoted by differing lowercase letter
(a, b).
| |
Bridge Creek, Barnstable |
Mill Creek, Sandwich |
|
Parameter(units) |
Restricted |
Natural |
Restricted |
Natural
|
|
Salinity (ppt) |
13.6 a |
14.6 a |
13.6 b |
29.5 c |
|
pH |
6.4 a |
6.1 a |
6.6 a |
6.3 a |
|
Redox (mV) |
-211 a |
-262 b |
-316 c |
-286 d |
|
Sulfide (uM) |
0.13 a |
0.14 a |
0.7 b |
1.0 c |
|
Nitrate (mM) |
0.07 a |
0.03 b |
0.28 c |
0.02 d |
Table 2: Site-specific comparison of two individual salt
marsh systems within Cape Cod Bay. Mean values of
selected pore water biogeochemical parameters are shown
between restricted and natural portions each system.
Differing lower case letters represent significant
differences between matched pairs at each site.
Perhaps
the most exciting preliminary outcome of this broad
sampling protocol, however, is documentation of the pore
water biogeochemistry occurring in the three main plant
communities observed throughout the 13 sites within 8
salt marsh systems studied; natural low marsh (Spartina-dominated),
transitional (Spartina-Phragmites), and invasive mid- to
high-marsh (Phragmites-dominated). The preliminary data
suggest that of the five biogeochemical parameters
sampled within each of these dominant plant communities,
only salinity appears to differ significantly (Table 3).
More unexpected is that the range of salinity observed
is relatively low and easily tolerated by native plant
species as well as invasive Phragmites, suggesting that
dramatic salinities may be required in natural and
tidally restricted sites to effectively utilize salinity
stress as a restoration strategy within many of the
sites examined.
|
Parameter(units) |
Spartina |
Transition |
Phragmites |
|
Salinity (ppt) |
22.0 (1.1) a |
19.2 (1.2) a |
12.2 (1.4) b |
|
pH |
6.2 (0.9) a |
7.7 (0.9) a |
6.3 (1.1) a |
|
Redox (mV) |
-257 (12) a |
-251 (13) a |
-227 (15) a |
|
Sulfide (uM) |
0.3 (0.1) a |
0.3 (0.1) a |
0.4 (0.1) a |
|
Nitrate (mM) |
0.2 (0.1) a |
0.2 (0.1) a |
0.2 (0.1) a |
Table 3: Comparison of selected biogeochemical
parameters for three dominant plant community types
within salt mashes of Cape Cod Bay. “Spartina” dominated
by Spartina alterniflora, “Phragmites” dominated by
Phragmites australis, and Transition” comprises elements
of the former two.
While
there remains considerable work and data analysis left
to do, the project is advancing steadily as we work
towards completing another season of data collection,
summary conclusions and management implications. This
project has received funding from Sweet Water Trust, The
Boston Foundation, New England Natural Areas Wildlife
Grants Program, William P. Wharton Foundation, Community
Foundation of Cape Cod , Grace W. Allsop Foundation, and
the CCS General Fund. |
 |